Skip to main content
Comparison

Materials Prep vs. a generic ELN.

Generic ELNs like Benchling, LabArchives, eLabFTW, and SciNote are designed around biotech experiments. Metallography is sample-first work: mounting, grinding, polishing, etching, imaging. Forcing the second into the first never quite fits.

The shape of the problem

Experiment-first vs. sample-first.

A biotech experiment is a one-time procedure with a result. A metallography sample is a physical object that lives through a sequence of preparation steps before it's imaged, sometimes weeks apart. The data model that fits one doesn't fit the other.

Generic ELNs treat every workflow as a form to fill out. Materials Prep starts from the sample and the prep, the way the lab already thinks about the work.

Capability
Materials Prep
Generic ELN
Sample as the primary unit of work
Every parameter and image hangs off the sample, not a generic 'experiment' container.
Yes. Yes
No. Experiment-first model
Mounting / grinding / polishing / etching as first-class steps
Structured fields for abrasive, grit, time, force, RPM, etchant, exposure.
Yes. Yes
No. Free-text protocol fields
Recipe book indexed by alloy, hardness, and mount type
Yes. Yes
Partial. Generic protocol templates
Working etchant catalog (composition, alloys, safety)
Yes. Yes
No. Free-text reagent fields
Searchable micrograph atlas indexed by alloy, condition, etchant
Yes. Yes
Partial. Image attachments
Batch logging that fans out across grouped samples
One step entry on a batch of pucks writes to every sample's journal.
Yes. Yes
No. Not built for this
Studies for failure analysis, qualification, R&D comparison
Yes. Yes
Partial. Project / folder grouping
Lab roles (admin / technician / viewer) with audit log
Yes. Yes
Yes. Yes
Biotech assay tracking, plate maps, sequence data
No. Not built for this
Yes. Yes
21 CFR Part 11 strict, GxP, validated environments
Materials Prep is suitable for ISO 17025 traceability and AS9100 process audits, not FDA-regulated records.
No. Not built for this
Yes. Yes
Built around metallography terminology and workflow
Yes. Yes
No. Not built for this

Generic ELN refers to broadly-applicable lab notebooks like Benchling, LabArchives, eLabFTW, and SciNote. Capabilities vary by vendor and tier.

Where each one fits

We're not trying to be a generic ELN.

This page is honest about what each tool is for. Generic ELNs do real work in biotech, in regulated pharma, in academic life-science labs. Materials Prep does real work in metallography. The two overlap less than the category “ELN” implies.

Pick a generic ELN if…

  • Your work is biotech assays, sequence data, plate maps, or animal-model studies.
  • You're under FDA scope and need 21 CFR Part 11 strict compliance.
  • You need a validated, GxP-ready environment for regulated pharma research.
  • Your lab spans many domains and needs a single domain-agnostic notebook.

Pick Materials Prep if…

  • Your lab's daily output is metallographic sample preparation, micrographs, and prep recipes.
  • Recipes by alloy and hardness, an etchant catalog, and a searchable micrograph atlas would change how the bench works.
  • You run failure analysis, qualification, university materials research, or in-house QA / metallurgical work.
  • You've tried to model metallography inside a generic ELN and given up.
FAQ

Common questions about switching.

Is Materials Prep a Benchling alternative?
Only for metallography. Benchling is a strong tool for biotech ELN workflows that involve assays, plate maps, and sequence data. Materials Prep is purpose-built for metallographic sample preparation. If your lab does both, it's reasonable to keep the biotech tool for biotech work and use Materials Prep for the metallography side.
Why not just use a generic ELN with custom templates?
You can model mounting and polishing inside a generic ELN by creating a custom protocol template. Several labs have. The trade-off is that recipe libraries by alloy and hardness, an etchant catalog, a searchable micrograph atlas, batch fan-out logging, and study comparisons all become workarounds inside someone else's data model. The closer you push, the more you're maintaining the workaround.
Does Materials Prep do the things a generic ELN does well?
Some of them. Lab roles, audit logging, soft-deleted recoverable records, and signed-URL image storage are built in. Things like assay plate maps, sequence data, and 21 CFR Part 11 strict compliance are not built and not on the roadmap; we're not pursuing FDA-regulated records as a segment.
Can I import my prep data from a generic ELN?
We don't have a one-click import yet. If you have an export from your current tool (CSV, JSON, or PDF), we can usually walk a few sample journals through manually so you can see how they translate. Email pace@metallographic.com.
Who shouldn't switch?
Service or contract labs that need a customer-facing portal, customer-branded reports, or invoicing. Labs working under FDA 21 CFR Part 11 strict scope. Labs that need a single tool to handle metallography and biotech experiments simultaneously. Materials Prep is built for in-house metallography labs (failure analysis, university materials, in-house QA) and is honest about that scope.

More about the workflow: how it works, recipes, atlas, etchants, trust and security.

Bring your lab's prep into one place.

Free to try. No setup call required.